In this series, we first analyzed the Virginia law surrounding public access to court documents, and explained that if Amber Heard thought that the things filed in the court would not be made public eventually, then she may have been ill-advised. After taking a first look at the 6,642 pages of documents unsealed by Judge Azcarate on July 13, 2022, now we'll dig deep and find out what's new, what's logical, and what's spin. All unsealed documents are available for download here: https://andreaburkhart.com/documents (References in this video correspond to the document numbers on that web site.) In this episode, our analysis of the unsealed files begins with answering the basic questions: Was the process fair? Do we see any indication that Amber Heard's complaints about the trial have merit? Is the jury verdict in jeopardy on appeal? Do any of these documents contain information that, had the jury known about it, would have probably changed the verdicts? 00:00 Intro 02:22 Amber's appeal doesn't look any better than it did before 04:02 Therapist notes not in the record, then not arguable on appeal 05:51 Excluding the UK judgment - just one dude's opinion 07:29 But we saw even more logical flaws in the UK judgment 11:58 "Mountains of evidence" excluded? Johnny had more limitations 12:21 Dr. Curry didn't get to do the interviews that Dr. Hughes did 14:02 Elaine opposed cameras when it would expose Amber's lies 15:30 No new indication of jury misconduct 15:55 Who poisoned the atmosphere, Elaine? 17:44 Any cloud on the verdict is dispelled by transparency 20:03 Johnny pushed for transparency from the beginning 21:34 Next video we'll identify the important new facts and new evidence Part 0 - Unsealing Confidential Files - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRnHxH37gBc Part 1 - First Look - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3lEHIq2UK4