More Assignments of error are in, but only from Johnny this time. Why did Johnny file what he did, and why didn't First Amendment Enthusiast Amber Heard bother to file any more? We'll examine the new assignments of error, and explore the underlying process for this stage of the appeal. What, if anything, does this new filing (and Amber's non-filing) tell us about the strategic approaches of the two parties? 00:00 Intro 00:42 The new filing is Johnny's response to Amber's assignments of error 01:42 Two judgments, two appeals 03:33 The person who won can't normally appeal, but can respond 04:48 First new error: Amber's anti-SLAPP claim 07:50 Second new error: Excluding the forensic pathologist Dr. Collins 12:27 Third new error: Jury instruction language - false statement vs. false implication 15:51 Bonus - how the jury instructions relate to the First Amendment arguments 18:36 Why none from Amber? Because most of those rulings went her way 22:25 So now we know all the appeal issues ... what next? My video on the initial Assignments of Error filings is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xxb199LZSYg