Set aside the verdict? Dismiss the complaint?? I don't think so. This is a deep dive into the legal and factual basis for Amber Heard's post-trial motions. We're going to break down her arguments, look at the law she cites, and evaluate exactly how bad these arguments are. Spoiler alert: If you were expecting high-level advocacy from Amber's team, prepare to be disappointed - it's just more of the same misleading, skewed demagoguery that ignores inconvenient facts and pretends the law is more favorable than it is. 0:00 Intro 00:35 Everything she's asking for 01:36 The law of remittitur, or reducing the damage award 09:28 "No evidence," or just no evidence you like? 14:23 The attack on Camille's argument is a big loser 18:44 The verdicts can be reconciled pretty easily 20:19 The First Amendment law really doesn't say what Elaine wants it to 29:02 There's evidence of republication and the jury was correctly instructed 32:06 More "no evidence" where there's lots of evidence 35:59 WTAF is she thinking going after Juror 15?? 42:14 Bottom line: It's going nowhere The motion is available for download here: https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/motion-to-set-aside-verdict.pdf