Here is the longer interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DTsy5LOWAU
Here are the conditions:
• We will be using proof not as an absolute but in the context of an overwhelming preponderance of evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
• I can attempt to reason with believers via a Socratic interaction, but that means that you must answer each of my questions, just as I must answer all of yours. Yet, the biggest problem I have with believers is that they will not answer. So if you repeatedly ignore direct points or queries, you will default this attempt, and I will thus be under no obligation to continue.
• The same goes if you repeatedly lie. If you make a claim, and that claim is challenged, you must show a peer-reviewed academic source to back it up. If you can't, then it will not be considered true.
• To avoid talking past each other, we must use a common language. Since we are talking about evolution, we will use the definitions provided by mainstream science sources, not straw-man distortions from religious propaganda.
• If you’re insincere, if you’re determined to deny reality and make-believe something else instead no matter what the truth is, then you’re going to have to break some or all of these rules. If that’s what you intend to do, then don’t even waste my time.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
null
If you like what I do, please consider supporting my efforts.
PATREON► https://www.patreon.com/aronra
PAYPAL► https://www.paypal.me/AronRa
688 Comments