Bis heute konnte noch keine Formel gefunden werden, die unser Universum in seiner Physik und Gesetzmäßigkeiten vollständig beschreiben kann. Denn unsere größten beiden Theorien, die Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie und die Quantentheorie, passen nach wie vor nicht zusammen. Aber jetzt will der Forscher Stephen Wolfram einen Weg gefunden haben, wie wir den genetischen Code unseres Universums entschlüsseln können. Kann das stimmen? Dieses Video wurde durch eure Unterstützung auf Patreon möglich gemacht. Vielen Dank an alle, die uns dort unterstützen und uns damit unabhängiger machen: http://patreon.com/DoktorWhatson Instagram: http://instagram.com/DoktorWhatson Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/DoktorWhatson Discord: http://discord.me/DoktorWhatson Musik von NOVAH: null Outro-Song: https://spoti.fi/2Wbh1Nw Weitere Musik von https://artlist.io/ Quellen: 1 – Interview Prof. Hermann Nicolai 2 – Hossenfelder, S. (2018). Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray. Basic Books, New York. | Interview Prof. Hermann Nicolai | https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 3 – https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 4 – https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 5 – https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 6 – https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 7 – https://www.mpp.mpg.de/forschung/aufbau-der-materie/stringtheorie/ 8 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 9 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 10 – https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 11 – https://www.wolframphysics.org/technical-introduction/potential-relation-to-physics/basic-concepts/#p-405 12 – https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 13 – https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27149-7_2 14 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ | https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 15 – https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27149-7_2 | https://interestingengineering.com/the-theory-of-everything-by-wolfram-gets-criticized-by-physicists 16 – https://www.spektrum.de/lexikon/physik/theory-of-everything/14428 17 – https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 18 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 19 – https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 20 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 21 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 22 – https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 23 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 24 – https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 25 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 26 – https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27149-7_2